Striking off the VAT payers from the relevant register will be possible without undertaking any verifying operations and – additionally – when the data given in the application for registration are untrue, and if the entity or their agent does not turn up for the summons of tax authority or tax inspection authority.
In addition, Article 96 subparagraph 9a was added to the VAT Act setting out five new cases in which taxpayers will be struck off from the VAT taxpayers register ex officio. This will apply to entities that:
1) suspended carrying out their business pursuant to the provisions on freedom of establishment for a period of at least 6 months (subject to Art. 96 subparagraph 9b and 9c of the VAT Act provides a possibility to report with a Head of the Revenue Office a longer period of suspension of business.
In such cases, the Head of the Revenue Office shall not strike off the taxpayer from the register or return its registration for a period indicated in the notification. In such a case, the taxpayer shall be registered again without any necessity to report any registration request on the day when the business activities are reopened with such a status as it had at the moment of suspension,
2) obliged to file VAT-7/VAT-7K returns, have not filed such returns for 6 subsequent monts or 2 subsequent quarters (unless as a result of summoning by the Head of the Revenue Office, the taxpayer proves that it runs business to be taxed or files the return immediately (Art. 96 subparagraph 9d of the VAT Act),or
3) filed for 6 subsequent months or 2 subsequent quarters VAT-7/VAT-7K returns, in which they indicated no sale or purchase with amounts of tax to be discounted (unless the failure to show sales or purchases arises, in accordance with the explanations of the taxpayer, from the specificity of the business run – Art. 96 subparagraph 9e of the VAT Act,
4) issued invoices or corrected invoices which did not document the real operations or else, so called „empty invoices” (unless, issuance of such invoices was the result of an error or took place without the taxpayers knowledge ( Art. 96 subparagraph 9f of the VAT Act),
5) running business, they knew or had justified reasons to suspect, that they participated in the procedure of fraud or tax law breach with the purpose to gain undue material benefits to the detriment of the State budget
The addition of provisions to set out the principles of restoring the registration of the taxpayer will accompany this with no necessity to file registration application (see Art. 96 subparagraph 9h and 9i of the VAT Act added on 1st January 2017).
On 1st January 2017, Art. 96 subparagraph 10a of the VAT Act will be added – this provision will facilitate cancelling from the register of VAT taxpayers, the active taxpayers who/which carry out exclusively tax-released operations, with a simultaneous leaving them in the register with the status of VAT released taxpayers in the situation when those taxpayers indicate in their tax returns for 6 subsequent months or 2 subsequent quarters, exclusively tax-released sale pursuant to Art. 43 of the VAT Act, but have not filed in the Revenue Office the relevant application to update the data.
The above shall not relate to the situation when it results from the explanations filed by the taxpayer, that the failure to show in the returns the sales other than that tax-released pursuant to Art. 43 of the VAT Act is related to the specificity of the business run and not to abandoning the carrying out of sale other than tax-released (see Art. 96 subparagraph 10b of the VAT Act added as on 1st January 2017). In such a case, it will be possible also to restore the registration of the taxpayer as an active VAT taxpayer , with no necessity to submit the application (see; Art. 96 subparagraph 10c of the VAT Act added as on 1st January 2017).
...